Tuesday, October 19, 2010

The Wheel of Unity....

Unity is something we talk a lot about these days.  This is not unprecedented and in fact the forefathers of our tradition had a lot to say on the subject.  I’ve shared before my interest in Thomas Campbell’s “Declaration and Address” in which he made an impassioned call for unity in the church of Christ.  Notice that wasn’t the Church of Christ, but the church of Christ.  In his declaration he makes 13 points that he believed are the key to unity.  One of my favorites is No. 7:
             7. That although doctrinal exhibitions of the great system of di-
             vine truths, and defensive testimonies in opposition to prevailing       
             errors, be highly expedient; and the more full and explicit they be,
             for those purposes, the better; yet, as these must be in a great
             measure the effect of human reasoning, and of course must con-
             tain many inferential truths, they ought not to be made terms of
             christian communion: unless we suppose, what is contrary to fact,
             that none have a right to the communion of the church, but such
             as possess a very clear and decisive judgment; or are come to a
                very high degree of doctrinal information; whereas the church
             from the beginning did, and ever will, consist of little children and
             young men, as well as fathers.

I love this one because it recognizes the value of scholarship, and at the same time makes it clear that he believes that there has been, and always will be, varying levels of understanding in the church.  Moreover, that there is should be no requirement that everyone understands or has reached a specific level of scholarship to be a member of the body.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

The Real World...

Remember this guy?  His name is Puck and he is the reason that most people in America watch TV today.  Well, that might be overstating it a little, but not much.  Puck was "THE" star on a little show on MTV called, "The Real World-San Francisco."  It was 1994, the show was in its third season and maybe the most popular ever.  The idea of the show was summed up at the beginning of each episode with a voice-over that went something like this:

"This is the true story... of eight strangers... picked to live in a house...work together and have their lives taped... to find out what happens... when people stop being polite... and start getting real...The Real World.


This, ladies and gentlemen, is the man you have to thank for "reality" TV.  Although the first seasons were unscripted, it's hard to look at a show like the "Real Housewives of Atlanta" and believe that these shows have anything to do with reality, let alone housewives.  So why the trip down memory lane and wandering discussions about pop-culture and media?  Well, over the course of the next few weeks or months I'm going to be putting up some posts that address what I believe America is looking for and has been for decades.  Reality TV, Facebook, and texting are all just symptoms of what I think good people all across this country are wanting.  And it goes much, much deeper.  It shows up in the cars we buy, the clothes we wear and even the food we eat.  And it's not Religion.

Saturday, September 11, 2010

A Lawyer's approach to Scripture...

Today as I was reading Morris' blog today and thinking about how I wanted to comment, I realized that my approach to scripture has been highly influenced by my legal education (please hold the jokes to the end of this post).  It has actually been a very useful approach for me and I owe it, mostly, to Professor Wendel.  Anytime a case presented itself, Professor Wendel always wanted us to look at three levels of addressing the case.  Let's take a simple example that I've used many times before.  It won't be a case, but it will be somewhat illustrate the point.  A two year old child stands at Main street, a very busy street, and starts to cross.  Her mother, upon seeing this, rushes up, grabs the child by the hand and says, "you are never to cross this street without me."  Now, let's use the Wendel method on these events.

The first level of dissection is the "Fact" level.  At this level, you addressed the facts of the case, the specific set of circumstances with which the court was dealing.  Here we have a very young child, and a very busy street that the child is contemplating crossing.  These facts are extremely important because the let us know exactly what is happening here and help us understand why the mother said what she did.  However, in order for this situation to be useful to other situations, we need to go to the next level, the "Rule" level.  While it may be useful for this mother to say that "no two year old daughter standing at Main Street is allowed to cross the street without me," that isn't very helpful in situations that vary from this one.  What about First Street?  What about a three year old?  What about a calm street?  

Wednesday, September 01, 2010

"Forget ever being a Christian again...

and never ask a friend, family member or coworker to become a Christian again..."  That was the message from a book I was reading today called, "The Big Idea."  It was written by, well, a Christian, but this was what he hoped the takeaway would be from that chapter.  He went on to say that, "85% of all Americans call themselves Christians.  However, research in North America shows that Christians are no more likely to give assistance to a homeless person than non-Christians; those who call themselves Christians are no more likely to correct the mistake when given too much change by a cashier; a Christian is just as likely to have an elective abortion as a non-Christian; Christians divorce at the same rate as non-Christians; even though there are more big churches than ever before, 50% of Christian churches didn't help a single person find salvation last year; when groups were surveyed on over 152 different topics there was almost NO difference between Christians and non-Christians, no difference in attitude and no difference actions.  If there is essentially no difference between the attitude and actions of Christians and non-Christians, is "Christian" really the word you want to use to describe your willingness to sacrifice everything you have to see God's dream fulfilled?"  Powerful food for thought.  Now many of us know people who are "acting" like Christians, who's lives and attitudes are committed to serving Christ, but can the same be said of you?...of me?  Good friends of ours, John & Kari Sowers, are doing some amazing things for the fatherless children of their community in Portland, and teaching other leaders to do the same.  John has written a book about theses issues and also talks about some of the solutions that they're working on.  I encourage you to take a look at the book here as well as the group's website.  What about us?  Being a "follower" of Christ suggests action.  What actions, what attitudes are we developing to bring salvation to the lost of this world?  Are we being the kind of people that cannot be confused with non-believers?  Please pray for the Spirit to move me to this new level and I will do the same for all of you.

Friday, August 06, 2010

What do you REALLY want???

"Do you like God?  That may sound like a strange question, and I don't mean to be glib about God.  But if I do not like being with God, I simply will not be with him much...The point of this is not to make you feel guilty that you should want God more.  'Should' simply does not have the power to get you there." - John Ortberg

So what do you think?  Do you like God?  Does the thought of being with God create a sense of love and joy and excitement in your heart, or is it more of an obligatory, luke-warm, have-to-go-to-church kind of feeling?  I think I've definitely been on both sides of this fence.  Growing up as a kid, going to YFE (Yosemite Family Encampment) was the absolute, unparalleled joy of my summer.  I looked forward to it, longed for it, and was completely bummed when it was over... and then started anticipating the next summer again.  I loved the devo's, the fellowship, even the church services (and I was a kid). I loved everything about it.  Just like church camp, this was my utter joy, the closest I would feel to God all year.  The desire for this kind of event was a God-inspired desire, it was something that God put in me and the satisfaction of that desire through these events was an absolute blessing.  

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Your Spiritual Life... taking your temperature

This morning I got back to reading a book I started months ago.  It's a great read, humorous and poignant, focusing on becoming who God created us to be.  The author's point in the first chapter is to say that God purposefully created each of us to do good work that He has prepared in advance (Ephesians 2:10).  What an awesome idea.  We are not our handiwork, our life is not our project.  God has created us with a purpose in mind and our goal is to allow the Spirit of God to direct us.  Can you imagine becoming what God, Adonia, Elohim, the Creator of the Universe has planned for you to be?  Sometimes I get so wrapped up in trying to figure it out, trying to decide who I am and what I need to be doing and how to achieve MY goals that I forget that it's not about MY desires and plans, it's about God's.  Would you rather be the pinnacle of what YOU can achieve, or the perfect realization of what God has designed you to be?  It's silly, but I focus more of my time of the former rather than the latter; no wonder that leads to frustration.  When we become who God designed us to be, when we learn to live in the flow of His Spirit, we can then be used in God's work to redeem the world.  The author finishes by saying that "The me God wants me to be" is measured by my capacity to love (John 13:35)  (Uh-oh...).  To know if I'm living in the flow, the author suggests that I ask myself two things to indicate how my spiritual life is going:
i.   Am I growing more easily discouraged these days?
ii.  Am I growing more easily irritated these days?


Those are powerful and convicting questions... so, "how is your spiritual life going?"


Be encouraged, God has a plan for you and the more you learn to live in the flow of His Spirit, the closer you will be to being the you God created you to be...
Blessings!

Monday, July 26, 2010

Classes this Fall.... Wednesday nights!

Hey everyone.  We're looking at classes for the fall and I'm thinking about doing a combined marriage/parenting class.  Each series lasts six weeks, so we can do them back to back.  I have a couple of suggestions and I'm attaching them here.  Let me know if this is something you are interested in, or if you have another request.  I prefer classes like this that are "real-life" based, not someone's idea of what a perfect Christian family should be.  These look pretty good, and I think they apply to a broad range of families and "families-to-be," but give me some feedback.  You can comment below.

Marriage- Built to Last


Parenting- The Early Years

Friday, July 23, 2010

This Sunday... Families of Faith at the building

Hey everyone, I hope you're enjoying your family devotionals.  It's a great opportunity to bring faith into your home.  This Sunday night beginning at 5pm, we will be getting together again at the building for a brief devotional, followed by food and water play.  We would love to have everyone there, so bring your family, lawn chairs, and bathing suits and towels and join us for a great time.  Our last meeting had nearly 40 people and it was a blast!  Remember, we start at 5pm in the auditorium.  If you missed the material last week, send me an email and I'll send the devotionals to you.  An RSVP would also be appreciated.

Thursday, July 08, 2010

Families of Faith, This Sunday, July 11 at 5pm at the Building

This Sunday night, from 5-7pm at the building, we will be starting our 6 week series on Families of Faith, a program put together by Peggy Scheppegrell and myself.  This will be a time of fellowship and fun, as well as an opportunity to get information and ideas on building your family of faith.  A national survey conducted by the Search Institute showed that when boys and girls from 7th-12th grade were asked who the "Most Significant Spiritual Influences" were in their lives, 81% of boy and 74% of girls said it was their mother.  That was followed by their Father, Grandparents, siblings, relatives and friends.  Their pastor didn't even make the top 5, movie and music stars ranked above any church activities with the exception of camps, their Youth Group Leader was 13th, the Bible was 16th and God himself didn't even make the top 20.  So what does all this mean?  It means that parents MUST take an ACTIVE role in the spiritual formation of their children.  The idea that sending Johnny and Jane to Sunday school or dropping them off with Grandma will ensure they have a strong faith is, at best, a misconception.  Our hope is to show you the importance of being involved in your child's spiritual life, give you ideas about how to make your home a place of faith, and help you connect to other families working toward the same goals.  We will be eating together and spending some time in devotional and then release the kids for a time of water play, including an inflatable slide.  We believe this will be a blessing for you and your children.  Please drop me an email letting me know if you and your family will be able to make it so we can be prepared with materials, etc.  Everyone with children in their lives is invited.
Many blessings,
Brice

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Is your child your Status Symbol?

Mitch and Gayle were in a dying, if not dead, marriage.  They had already split when they came in to talk to the counselor.  Working session after session, the counselor struggled with finding the root of their issues, until he asked to look at their calendars.  Mitch and Gayle revealed that each morning before school, Mitch took their 13 year old to French lessons and then went to work for 9 hours at a CPA firm.  After work, he grabbed the daughter, drove 40 minutes to private dance lessons, spent 2 hours there, and drove home.  The money for French and dance was tapping their bank accounts and the time apart was tapping their marriage.  Most important to them was the success of their child.  Does this true story sound familiar?  Have we let our child become our status symbol.  My child goes to (fill in the school)... Little Pete is on (insert championship team) and (insert other sport) and...  Does scripture support this model?  Does this sound like God first, Marriage Second and Children third?  What did God say to Eli in 1 Samuel 2:29?  Does the status symbol child bring glory to God?  Does it create Godly marriages?  How can the church help families get back to a God centered hierarchy?  Stay tuned....

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

I take it back...

Forget everything I said in my last post... toss it out with the rubbish.  I want the first century church back, all of it, right NOW!  Well, maybe not all of it... but the part with the lions and the persecution of Christians... that's the part I want back.  Forget UFC on Saturday nights in Tulare (btw, did anything really happen on Saturday nights in Tulare before UFC?), let's get some good old lions and the Christians back in the ring.  I want Christians to be afraid again, afraid of the government, and I don't mean "Tea-Party" style, I mean afraid of oppression.  I want us to have to go underground, fear for our safety, have hand-signs and secret passwords.  I want us to be so busy trying to keep each other from prison, help each other survive, and caring for each other's needs that we have to band together like elephants surrounded by lions.  I want "Afghanistan-style" Christianity where being a believer means risking your life. Why, you ask, would anyone want this type of Christianity?  You tell me....

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Restoring the Early Church.... No thanks!

I've been thinking about this a little today and does "restoring the early church" really make any sense?  Can you imagine any other group, business, organization, university, etc saying, "what we really need to do is go back to the way our organization was 2000 years ago."  Does it make sense culturally, philosophically, educationally, or spiritually to go back to the way things were?  Think about Paul's words to the Philippian church regarding his spiritual journey:

     "Not that I have already obtained this or have already reached the goal; but I press on to make it my own, because Christ Jesus has made me his own.  Beloved, I do not consider that I have made it my own; but this one thing I do: forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the heavenly call of God in Christ Jesus.  Let those of us then who are mature be of the same mind; and if you think differently about anything, this too God will reveal to you.  Only let us hold fast to what we have attained."  Philippians 4: 12-16

      Paul is letting the brethren at Philippi know that he's ok in prison, and that he continues to strive forward in his relationship with Christ.  The early churches had their own wealth of problems and issues, at times even fearing for their own survival.  They lacked the texts we have today, they lacked the freedoms, and they lacked the decades and centuries of experience and education we have.  The culture of the early church was one that few if any of us have experienced today.  Do we really want to turn back the clocks on all we have "attained?"

     What I realized this past week was that we, the Church, have lost some of our community.  Being together morning, noon, and night, was a tremendous blessing.  We got up early and stayed up late (maybe too late) talking with our brothers and sisters, sharing a meal, enjoying activities, worshiping God, and sharing our triumphs and our burdens, and it was, in my mind, pure heaven.  Everyone was family and I was blessed to meet new members of that family while reconnecting with lifelong members.  Now I could go for a little more of that type of restoration.

     Admittedly the church (little "c"- institution) and the Church (big "C"- the people) have had our setbacks and struggles and continue to do so today.  But with the exception of the closeness of the community, the idea that somehow things were better back in the "good ol' days" seems like faulty logic to me.  In fact, even the closeness of those early communities were more likely a response to necessity than to mere "enlightenment."  (Today we likely have an even greater ability to fellowship and share with one another, we simply continue to make choices, material and otherwise, that make that more difficult, but that's another post.) Culturally, spiritually, and educationally I think that tremendous strides and additions have been made.  I think the bigger question is, are we prepared, as a Church, to reveal Christ, to be Christ to God's people "for such a time as this?"

Thoughts on Pepperdine...

Well, my intention of giving you updates after each class or each day obviously failed.  Let me say however, that it was a wonderful lectureship, perhaps the best I've been to in years.  There were so many fantastic classes being offered each hour that it made it very difficult to choose.  Thank God for CD's because the church will be bringing home quite a few of the classes.  I encourage all of you to check them out at the office.  I'll try to remember to drop a schedule by so you can see what the classes were about, but I highly recommend getting in there and listening to these dynamic, Christ-filled speakers.
A few themes really stuck out this year to me, and I think they were about redrawing our lines, emphasizing inclusion over exclusion, and focusing on the work in the world as opposed to the issues in the church.  It was emboldening, enlightening, and challenging.  One takeaway for me was this statement: "Jesus didn't come to start a new religion, He came to reveal the Father."  Just some food for thought...

Wednesday, May 05, 2010

The first night...

Yesterday we arrived at Pepperdine, only after a short delay at Pinkberry.  We went to one of our favorite restaurants for dinner and then returned to campus for a little praise and worship before bed.  It was awesome!  We were blessed to hear two fantastic worship teams: Psallo and Metropolitan Praise.  There are some truly wonderful singing groups on campus, but if you have not heard these groups, you've really missed the full experience.  I can't tell you how uplifting, inspiring, encouraging and spirit-filled these groups are, you just have to see and hear them for yourselves.  What I can tell you is, a couple of ministers and one or two elders from a congregation we all know and love were praising the Lord in a style that would have made King David proud!  Hope you are all having a blessed week and we miss you if you're not here, and we hope to see and fellowship with you if you are!

Sunday, May 02, 2010

Exciting News...

I just wanted to make you all aware of a new blog that I think will be a blessing to the community of believers.  Morris Yates has just "sprouted" a new blog that I believe will grow into a mighty oak of resources for Christians everywhere.  I encourage you to jump over to http://helpsforthejourney.wordpress.com and post a comment of encouragement.  I can't wait to see what he does with it.
Blessings,
Brice

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Chapter 9: "So Who Is My Brother/Sister?"

This week we're looking at a variety of issues in the COC and trying to understand what they say about who  my "brother or sister" is in Christ.  When it comes to baptism, the Lord's Supper, and Woman's Roles in the church, is there an authorized set of beliefs?  If so, where does the authority come from?  What if individuals, in their pursuit of Christ, don't come up on the same side of the coin?  Does that mean that one is wrong and the other right?  Can we fellowship with our "wrong" brother or sister?

"No one will be saved in rebellion and unbelief, but all who are saved will be so in spite of their imperfection of both their faith and performance."

Do you think this is a truthful statement?

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Chapter 8: The Proposal At Work...

Today's chapter looks at the "rubber meeting the road," so to speak.  The author begins by looking at "Lone Ranger" Christianity, the idea that we don't need church to be a Christian.  So often in my past I have agreed with this, but then made the followup remark, "but it's really hard." Today I don't believe that anymore... what I mean is, I don't believe you can be a Christian without the Church.  I capitalize "Church" because I'm not referring to any congregation or building, but to a community of believers.  Today I believe that being a part of the Church is essential to Christianity.  A study is cited that shows, when polled, the growing group in America is "spiritual but not religious."  Many of us have decided that we can do without "organized religion" but we are increasingly feeling spiritual.  The question is put forth, "will religion survive the spirituality boom?"   Another important question arises: how can it be that "what was intended to be a catalyst for spiritual life (religion/the church) has become a hindrance to it in far too many instances"?  What do you think?  Do we really need a church?  The Church?

Further on, the author also goes on to suggest that perhaps our struggle with church may come from relational issues, wondering if we can be "distinctive without being divisive?"  The thinking is that distinctiveness without relationship can lead to division and even discord.  If we include relationship, we begin to understand each other in a better way, seeing the person rather than the issue.  In this manner, the relationship becomes more important than the distinctiveness, and we are able to enjoy each other without division.  The skeptic could argue that this is just a form of "I'm ok, you're ok," an idea that we have viewed as negative and unscriptural "relativism".  Is there room for this kind of thinking in our theology?

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Being God's Child; Event or Process?

Tonight we're starting Chapter 7 in "The Jesus Proposal."  For those of you who might be confused, that's page 123.  It's an interesting look at the means and methods that we often use for determining who's "in and out" in terms of God's people.  Moreover, it's an attempt to look more at the Christianity as a process rather than an event.  One of my favorite excerpts is not from either of the two authors, but from a quote of Alexander Campbell:

       "It is the image of Christ the Christian looks for and loves; and this does not consist in being exact in a few items, but in general devotion to the whole truth as far as known."  Mr. Campbell goes on to expand on the "as far as known" idea by saying, "Ignorance is always a crime when it is voluntary; and innocent when it is involuntary."

The author goes on to quote a youth minister, Tony Jones, saying, "...it could be said that we ought to first evangelize experientially and teach the content of the faith later!"

Essentially the Mr. Jones is suggesting that we should demonstrate the lifestyle before we discuss the matters of deeper faith.  Or is he?  What do you think about that idea?  Is there a biblical basis for it?  Does it make sense logically?  Let's talk about it.

Wednesday, March 03, 2010

Wednesday Night Class: "The Jesus Proposal"

Follow the link to the podcast for tonight's class... hope to see you all there.  Church building, 7pm, library!

Saturday, February 27, 2010

"For the Kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit" Rom 14:17


This week we start a new study on Wednesday night, "The Jesus Proposal" by Rubel Shelly and John O. York.  I will have some books on Sunday and order more when they are available.
The first chapter discusses similar changes in our world and culture that we've been talking about in the Crux.  One of the most striking statements to me was the verse above, "For the Kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit."  (Romans 14:17)  What a powerful statement that Paul is making.  What is he trying to say?  Should we not worry about eating and drinking?  Will we not have to worry about food and drink in Heaven?  Or is he saying something else, something that resonated as much 2000 years ago as it is today?

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Chapter 10, The Future of the Churches of Christ

Well here we are at the end, with only one class left to go.  The authors take this chance to really pin down what principles they feel are really at the Crux of the matter.  They discuss the cross, baptism, a cappella music, the Lord's supper, missionary societies and more..., some of which are at the crux and others are "important," but "not at the crux of the matter..."  Tonight we'll review this chapter and talk about what issues really are at the crux, why it's important to continually reexamine our traditions and doctrine in light of Scripture and what that really means.  Have we got it all figured out?  Will we ever?  Is it necessary for membership that we do?  Is it necessary for salvation?  We'll discuss tonight.

Monday, February 15, 2010

Chapter 9; The Crux of the Matter

     Chapter 9 takes the book's title, letting the reader know that this is what it's all about.  The authors begin by looking at a "fictional" scenario in which two groups in a congregation are pulling for different, and intrinsically opposed, worship programs.  One side doesn't like where things are headed with devotional songs and praise teams, and the other feels as if things aren't moving "forward" fast enough, hoping for a more contemporary and relevant service.  Next the book looks at the early Corinthian church and the struggles it faced, namely power and wisdom.  Power, because there was infighting as to what spiritual gift was greatest, and wisdom, because they were proud of their educational emphasis and no too impressed with Paul.  The church didn't feel comfortable with the idea that God came to earth as a man and was humiliated and embarrassed on the cross, so they tended not to preach Christ crucified.  In no short order, Paul sets things straight and tells them that the greatest gift is love (charity) and that Christ crucified IS the gospel, end of story.  Paul goes on to address other specific issues in the church at Corinth, like disruptions in the worship service and the less-than-virtuous activity of sexual relations with your in-laws (seriously, did they really need someone to point that out?!).  The authors spend most of their time on what they call "the Crux," which is this:
      "The cross of Christ ought to make a difference in how you live, how you teat one another, how you restrain your freedoms and subdue your desires in order that others may be served.  It ought to affect the choices you make, the words you use, the sacrifices you offer.  The concerns of Christ should be reflected in everything you do." (p. 210)
      On Sunday morning our table discussed the interesting idea that sometimes the most simple idea can be the most significant.  As Christians, by definition,  we all believe in the deity and resurrection of Christ.  But do we understand why his death was and is so significant?  Beyond being the "act" of salvation, why is it so amazing, so earth-shattering, so transformative?  The answer: Because he didn't have to.  He was Yahweh, Jehovah, Elohim, Adonai.  This was the Lord of Lords and the King of Kings on the cross.  If you think Elijah set it off on Baal, just imagine what God the Creator could have done at Golgatha.  But he didn't.  He restrained all His power, all His freedom for our good, so that His sacrifice might have meaning and power greater than any event before or after.  If the Lord Almighty can sacrifice everything, do we have any place to put our interests before other's?  Can you honestly say, that when you meet God face to face, pierced hand to hand, punctured side to side, that you want to explain why you were justified in promoting your interests at the expense of a relationship with your brother or sister?  That is the Crux.
     So what does a life transformed by the cross look like?

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Chapter 8

This week's chapter is about understanding Healthy Doctrine.  The authors draw a distinction between our desire for "sound doctrine" and a more scriptural "healthy doctrine."  They emphasize that a desire for "sound doctrine" focuses on getting it all right, while healthy doctrine is a broader concept.  Healthy doctrine incorporates and understanding of the coure of God's entire story in scripture, reading from this core or center, and allowing our ministry in Christ to shape our understanding.  While trying to "get it right" has its place, it is not the end of the matter.  As we look through the lens of God's story, and walk that story out in our lives, our understanding of doctrine deepens and we see that there is even a place for Grace in our understanding.  Come to class tonight, 7pm in the upstairs library, and we will dig a little deeper into "The Crux" of the matter.

Wednesday, February 03, 2010

Thoughts on Chapter 7, Facilitating an Understanding

Thoughts on Chapter 7 of the Crux.  Is there a better way to read scripture?  How do we do that?  Does that mean we can all come to the same understanding?

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Chapter Six, Our Identity (The Crux of the Matter)


Let's try this again... sorry for the Ben Stein-esque monotone, but I just wanted to get something going...

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

The past made present...

Marcus Cicero once said:
     "Not to know what has been transacted in former times is to always be a child.  If no use is made of the labors of past ages, the world must remain always in the infancy of knowledge."

     I believe this is really what the authors of the Crux are trying to say in Chapter 4 (Yes, I know we skipped chapter 3, but to summarize: certain of us fall into different groups and we see life with different perspectives which translate into how we approach scripture.  End of summary).  For those of us who have grown up in the Church of Christ tradition, it was a real eye-opener.  We found out that our roots are closely tied to many groups: Lutherans, Calvinists, Anabaptists, Presbyterians.  Moreover we discovered that each of these groups added something to the way we practice our faith today.  It helped me to realize that when I struggle or have questions about our tradition or our practices, I might be able to find the foundations of those practices in more modern times.  With this knowledge, I can look to recent history and possibly discover the reasoning and understand the culture in which these practices or beliefs were established.  I realized that we as a tradition are the culmination of centuries of shaping and forming that happened far after the church in Acts and continues right up until today.  Some of our greatest traditions, while perhaps based in the "early church," were actually formed and formulated in the last 200-300 years.  To Martin Luther we owe our understanding of the "priesthood of all believers;" to Ulrich Zwingli our view of scripture as the ultimate authority; to the Anabaptists our commitment to full immersion baptism of adults; to John Calvin the idea that God is "ultimately, completely, and solely in charge of everything;" to Alexander Stone and the Presbyterians our commitment to autonomous congregations led by elders... and the list goes on.  Each group subsequently working and shaping the tradition we honor today.  Some practices or beliefs were of great benefit and scripturally based, others less so, but they are all part of the history of our faith.  Chapter 4 really brought home that the story continues to be formed and with it our tradition and our faith.     What will our contribution be?

     In class on Sunday morning a pertinent question was asked that went something like this: "If honest, intelligent, hardworking people study the scriptures faithfully, will they all come to the truth? Will that truth be the same for each person?  What are the implications of your answer?"
This question brought on much discussion both in class in some subsequent small groups.  Would everyone come to the SAME truth?  Would we all arrive at the SAME understanding?  Our group found it hard to accept that EVERYONE would come to the SAME truth.  While we might agree on some things, we would surely not agree on EVERYTHING.  So what are the implications?